Sunday, April 26, 2009

GEN 220 FINAL EXAM INFO

Spring 2009

TAKE-HOME ESSAY - 50 pts.

Fifty points of your midterm is based on the following essay question. Don't forget to use detailed examples and proofread your work. This essay must be typed and handed in at the start of the exam.

Q.) Based on your reading of the book The Scratch of a Pen, describe three specific examples of the convergence of different cultures in North America and the impact of environmental and cultural factors in the adaptation of cultural groups in colonial North America.

IN-CLASS ESSAY - 50 pts.

You must answer one of the following essay questions in class. Books and notes are not allowed.

1.) The French and Indian War was affected by events or by people who never set foot in North America. Describe three of those events or people. What was their importance concerning the war? How did they change the war's progress or its outcome?

2.) Compare and contrast the Indian-European politics of the Florida Territory with that of the Louisiana Territory, demonstrating three differences or similarities. Did these leave a positive or negative effect on North Americans?

MULTIPLE CHOICE/MATCHING - 20 pts.

In class you will answer multiple choice questions, matching, or fill-in-the-blanks. They will be similar to your quizzes. They will be based primarily on the notes posted on the class blog. Each question will be worth two points.

SHORT ANSWER - 30 pts.

In class you will be required to write short definitions or descriptions of six of the terms below. The actual list given in class will be shorter than the one you see here. Remember to not only define the terms but discuss in detail their importance in our study of colonial America. Short answer choices not used in the short answer section will be used in the Matching section of the test.

Great Awakening
Dr. Wheelock
Fighting by proxy
Jeffrey Amherst
Gifts
Proclamation Line of 1763
Acadians
Crispus Attucks
"Indianized" settlers
Revisionist history
Salamanca, NY
Neutrals
Hudson's Bay Company
The Griffon
Fort Niagara
Fort Ross
Keepers of the Western Door
Witchcraft
Three Flags Day
Reduction
Handsome Lake

Crispus Attucks

Considered the first casualty of the American Revolution
Is this him? "A Mulatto fellow, about 27 Years of Age, named Crispus, 6 feet 2 inches high, short cur'l hair, his knees nearer together than common."
Worked as a slave, a sailor, and a ropemaker
British sailors often worked second jobs cheaply, threatening the livelihoods of others.
The British Navy often “impressed” American sailors, forcing them into labor for years at a time

Biography
According to some evidence, Crispus’ father was African. “Crispus” may be an ancient Roman name
His mother may have been a Wampanoag Indian, from a “praying town” family near Natick, Massachusetts. “Attucks” and “Natick” may be native derivations of the word “deer.”
Attucks was rather large in stature and known for agitating others. He probably escaped from his master during a trip to join a whaling expedition
Not long before the Massacre, off-duty British soldiers attempted to enter a pub to find work

John Adams described those who started the riot as "a motley rabble of saucy boys, negroes and molattoes, Irish teagues and outlandish jack tarrs [sic]”
John Fiske, historian: “The soldiers did many things that greatly annoyed the people. They led brawling, riotous lives, and made the quiet streets hideous by night with their drunken shouts. ... On Sundays the soldiers would race horses on the Common, or would play `Yankee Doodle' just outside the church-doors during the services."

After the riot, John Adams defended the soldiers in court. He theorized that Attucks was a “rabble-rouser” who helped create the emergency
Attucks became a hero of the abolition movement, especially as the Civil War approached
During periods of war, Attucks becomes a symbol of hard work, patriotism, and devotion to the ideals of democracy
In recent decades, he is also an example of ethnic diversity (sometimes forced) in American history

Salem Witch Trials

Changing Communities
Settlers first stayed in clusters for protection from animals, Indians, weather, and starvation
Settlers branched out with more colonial stability. Land became scarce with higher populations
Ports allowed for vital supplies as well as a place to trade goods
Some earned more money than others, creating upper and lower classes
Some colonists felt a loss of community or jealously against others

Social Upheaval
More established families had better, more profitable lands
Families lost power the farther they moved out
Wars with Indians decimated the male population
The numbers of widows and orphans increased
Women began to gain more landowning privileges
Many widows and orphaned daughters took work as servants for entrenched upper classes
In New England, many settlers immigrated for deeply held, conservative, religious beliefs

Witchcraft
European superstition held that witches could destroy property, possess others' souls, cause illness, and display “aggressive, unfeminine behavior”
1691: Several teenage girls asked an African slave woman, Tituba, to tell them their fortunes and talk about sorcery.
Later, the girls appeared to act abnormally. Citizens pressured them to say who possessed them
The girls named 2 white women and Tituba

Fear
Fear and hysteria led accusations to become evidence alone; “spectral evidence” allowed
In all of New England, 342 people were accused of witchcraft. One-third were women who had or would inherit large tracts of land
In Salem, 29 were convicted of witchcraft, 19 killed (14 women)
About 150 were imprisoned

Effects
An aversion to superstition and more emphasis on reason and rule of law
Newer generations were less willing to accept restrictions on personal behavior and economic freedom
Rise of the “Protestant work ethic.” Instead of focusing on religious piety, citizens worked hard for trade and economic gain
Settlers became more open to outside influences

Russians in America/Hudson's Bay

Practically landlocked, Russia attempted to gain colonies that rivaled Europe
Vitus Bering was a Dutch explorer hired by the Russian navy to fight in the Baltic Sea
Afterwards, Peter the Great had Bering explore the easternmost reaches of the Russian Empire
Bering returned to Moscow in 1730, having reached the Kamchatka peninsula
Ivan Federov explored mainland Alaska in 1732, dying shortly after

Colonization
Russians established a profitable fur trade throughout the northern Pacific coast
The first permanent settlement was on Kodiak Island, 1786
Russia’s first joint stock company was chartered in 1799
Russian American Company existed until 1867, when the US bought Alaska
The RAC built settlements as far away as Hawaii
Most traders lived temporarily, or depended totally on the natives for pelts

Alutiiq
Russians depended on the Aleutian natives for trade, shelter, food, and geographical expertise
Many Aleutians do not consider themselves “Indian” or “Inuit”
Russian settlements only survived because of large Creole populations
The Tsar encouraged promyshlenikis to intermarry with Aleutians
By 1866, only 66 Russians lived in the colonies. Out of 1100 natives in the settlements, 900 were Creoles

Hudson’s Bay Company
Founded in 1666, the company explored the north and west parts of Canada and traded furs
To eliminate European competition, a series of forts and trading posts were built
In 1670, they were given a Royal Charter giving them sole trading rights around Hudson Bay. Competition flourished in surrounding areas.
The York Factory was built to enhance trade with natives and support exploration
Hudson’s Bay traders were the first Europeans to see prairies and bison

North West Company
Founded in Montreal in 1779, this rival to HBC controlled much of western Quebec
NWC also traded furs and blankets
Whereas the HBC tried to find an Arctic passage to Asia, the NWC continued farther south towards the Pacific
Frequent clashes with HBC interests sometimes led to open fighting
In 1821 the companies merged, controlling more than 3 million square miles of land

Russian American Company
RAC and HBC had years of territory disputes in the 1820s
When the US bought Alaska, RAC changed its identity to the Alaska Commercial Company
Later, it merged with the Hudson’s Bay Company
Then, it split off into a separate chain that took the name of the NWC. It still exists in rural areas
Some related companies include The Bay, Zellers, NWC, Simpson’s, Kmart
HBC is now owned by Lord & Taylor’s

Russian American Company

Remapping the Frontier

Indian Country
War between England and France disrupted North American economies, even in the west
Indian tribes allied with either nation, not just for defense but for basic necessities
Great Lakes Indians saw Britain encroaching further west, siding with France
Indians in the East, often with old trading and political bonds, stayed with Britain
In between, some tribes stayed neutral (Delawares)

Power Structure
Some tribes did not work for victory on one side, but a balance of power between both
Indians would work alongside European troops, not under them
1763 meant the end of three-way politics. Tribes important as go-betweens were pushed out by Britain or ran way
Tribes used seasonal migration patterns to move in and out of new British settlements
Soldiers, settlers, swine slowly superseded squaws

Remapping the Frontier

By force:
Indian leaders killed or captured
Villages burned
Land sales signed under duress
Settlers overwhelm natives with overpopulation
By occupation
Are Indian tribes under colonial law, or are they foreign countries?
Tribes allowed for temporary European intrusions, but the Europeans would stay
Indians were bribed to sign treaties, even if they were not tribal leaders

Natives & Newcomers Ch. 6: Conversions

Natives encountered 2 waves of Europeans:
Amicable, temporary business relationships
Conflicting, long-lasting struggles for control
Missionaries' thoughts before landing:
Natives were “very ready to leave their old and blind idolatries and to learn of us the right service and worship the true God” (146)
“savage,” “barbarian,” “degenerate”

Reduce, Reuse, Repent

Missionaries wanted to “reduce” the Indians from “savagery” to “civility”
In reducing one's Indianness, missionaries replaced traditional identities with Christian ones
What could define Indianness?
Spirituality
Tradition
Heirarchy
Ego
Ethnocentrism

Praying Towns/Reserves/Missions

To succeed, missionaries had to be involved in native life, not living parallel to it
Wilderness settlements welcomed natives
Permanent dwellings and institutions
Farms
Churches and clergy
Schools – instruction in Europeanness
Christian doctors
Trading posts

How to win friends . . .

Show you are not a threat
Adoption into a family or tribe
Change name
Learn language/dialect
Communicate to children
Earn trust through gestures of equality
Minor similarities in dress and speech
Join hunting parties
Taking part in local rituals
However, no intermarriage
Witchcraft?

. . . and influence people

Make sure individual natives are not a threat
Competition with shamen. Witchcraft?
Invite natives into “family of God”
Relate to local religious beliefs
Christ as the “Master Spirit” or “Creator”
Have natives adopt Christian names
Teach European languages
Create schools with religion & language classes
Gestures of equal civility
Inhabit property year-round, farm
Take part in church, holiday services
However, no intermarriage

“Civility”

Hardline converters often failed, or worse
Missionaries could change native faiths, but “ways of life” were more difficult
Marriage
Sitting still in class
Fasting
“In large measure, whatever success the Jesuits enjoyed was gained not by expecting less of their converts, as the English accused, but by accepting more.” (163)

Louisiana and Lord Amherst

Treaty of Fontainebleau - 1762
Secret treaty between France and Spain
Spain given Louisiana and New Orleans
Treaty of Paris, 1763:
Britain takes Louisiana east of the Mississippi
Spain takes west Louisiana
See “British Indian Territory” pg. 166
French citizens fled from British control, only to find they were now ruled by the Spanish
German and Creole (early Louisianan) citizens rebelled against the Spanish in 1768, but were quickly put down
Treaty of San Ildefonso - 1800
Secret treaty where Spain gave western Louisiana back to Napoleonic France
The transfer also confirmed a previous treaty that allied Spain and France against Britain

Three Flags Day
3/9/1804: Spain officially hands Louisiana over to France
3/9/1804: France officially hands Louisiana over to the US in the Louisiana Purchase
None of these treaties accurately defined where Louisiana was (see pg. 167)
1804: US's Lewis and Clark explore

Where was Louisiana?
Generally, Louisiana was the Mississippi River system west of the Appalachian Mountains and south of the Great Lakes
Unlike French settlers in Quebec, French Louisiana consisted of settlers who assimilated into Indian cultures and families
Sparsely populated – both French and Indian
French depended on Indians for food and furs, making alliances
British could not control British settlers. How could they control French ones?

St. Louis

Founded in 1764 by French-speaking traders from New Orleans
Traders used old alliances and kinship bonds to trade with Midwestern natives
Though created through Spanish rule, St. Louis attracted French settlers fleeing from the British
Became the capital of “Upper Louisiana”
“It grew up speaking French, and its new imperial guardian made no attempt to change it” (130)

Lord Amherst (p. 26)
Over two dozen tribes traded with the French near St. Louis
Even though the British controlled trade and produced trade goods, the French did the trading
Jeffrey Amherst, British Commander-in-Chief, tried to force new trade alliances
He stopped giving gifts, upsetting traditional trade practices
Several times he suggested infecting Indians with smallpox to “Extirpate this Execrable Race” (also see p. 73)

In the 7 Years War, Amherst conquered Montreal and Quebec City. To disgrace the defeated French, he burned their flags
“Amherst viewed an empire as something to be governed, not negotiated and cultivated” (69)
Without good trading partners, Indians could not get needed weapons for hunting/defense
Amherst also demanded the return of prisoners, even “Indianized” ones
The British sent Amherst back home for fouling up British-Indian relations

Dr. Wheelock's Little Red School

“For the education & instruction of Youth of the Indian Tribes in this Land in reading, writing & all parts of Learning which shall appear necessary and expedient for the civilizing & christianizing Children of Pagans as well as in all liberal Arts and Sciences” (174)

Emerged out of the Great Awakening
Emotional attachment to religion
Focus on proselytization
Propagation through missionary work
In early attempts, Wheelock found Indians ungrateful for his work on them
Some whites thought natives could not be converted without force
Others argued that conversion would still not make them equal with whites, only blacks

Wheelock's impressions

Indian boys were:
Lazy
Did not use furniture
Wore shabby clothes
Were unruly
Think only about the present
Ate a lot, but had no table manners
Goal was “to save the Indians from themselves and to save the English from the Indians”
While capable of teaching his students, their “character” did not change

Native Impressions
At first, a change to learn foreign language and cultures, as well as trades
Children were beaten and yelled at for minor infractions
Emphasis on farming was less like education and more like hard labor
Indians were treated as inferiors, even by English boys their age

The End
Funds came from Europeans in Europe
Europeans in America doubted the school's success
Natives grew increasing upset at student treatment, pulling children out of school
Only 11 Indian students ever graduated

Florida

A weak Spanish colony with few settlers
To encourage growth, Spain offered freedom to runaway British slaves
Britain created Georgia as a buffer between the colonies and Spain
Spain created Fort Mose in 1738, a town of free blacks north of St. Augustine, to buffer between itself and Britain
Small French colonies also sprung up, threatening Spanish Florida further. Spain was attacked often by France and Britain

Attacks
Pirates and Indian slaves also attacked Spanish settlements.
To survive, the Spanish allied with the Apalachee tribe
Spain continued the mission system to convert freedmen and Indians to Catholicism
Britain, realizing the growing southern threat, allied with the Creeks and attacked the Apalachees. The tribe disbursed and many became slaves

1763
Spain
1763: Britain wins 7 Years War, takes Havana, Cuba from Spain
Spain trades Florida to get Cuba back
Florida becomes British, split into East and West colonies. Thousands of Spanish flee
Apalachee
Defeated by war and disease, Apalachees and other tribes were adopted into local nations
Many moved to present-day Alabama and Louisiana
Apalachees, escaped slaves, and Creeks merged to form a distinct Seminole nation
“tinctured with
Spanish civilization”
(p. 109)
Exiles and Expulsions
England became Britain after merging with Scotland in the early 1700s. East and West Florida, the British Caribbean, and Quebec all had Scottish governors (156)
To encourage growth, Britain offered large land grants to Florida settlers, more if settlers brought slaves (157)
See the peace conference on p. 102, involving the Creek, Cherokees, and Chocktaws

The British hoped settlers would move to Florida or Nova Scotia instead of crossing the Appalachians (94)
The Land Proclamation of 1763 attempted to keep settlers under control and protect the peace between European and Indian empires (map 95)
Previous negotiations made Creeks the most powerful of regional tribes, but by 1763 they had enemies and factions

Floridian Trade
Seminoles traded via canoe throughout the Gulf of Mexico: deerskins, honey, dried fish
British and Spanish colonies traded coffee, rum, sugar, tobacco
The Proclamation Line kept settlers away but encouraged trading licenses
Deerskins were in high demand. Indians rapidly depleted deer populations
More interdependence on international trade led to dependence on foreign goods. Lack of resources led to poverty and social unrest

Men, Women, Alcohol

Excessive drinking amongst natives led to:
Injury
Fights
Poor trade decisions
Poverty
Temperance and reorganization
Christian Indians
American missionaries
Prophets and spiritual leaders
The US Government wanted to “civilize” natives. Alcoholism was “uncivilized,” therefore trade must be stopped
Women
Alcohol trade represented and altered female roles in native life
Women held roles in native governments, allowing them to control trade
Women were “go-betweens” bringing liquor from the market to home
Women controlled food production, including grains making alcohol
As time progressed, male-dominated Americans traded with native men instead

Why drink?
Delicious
Drunkenness used in mourning rituals
A gateway to the spiritual world
In some nations alcohol used for dowries
Europeans used liquor to attract traders, then to get the best deal out of them.
Alcohol was increasingly used as currency: 60%-90% of fur trade done in liquor
Gift-giving for trade
Encouraged Indians “to hunt and pay their debts”
White drinking
Whites appeared to have a higher tolerance: “the art of getting drunk”
Whites consumed five times more liquor, but in moderation
Indians drank alcohol until it was gone, a process that could take an entire tribe and several days
Drinking became associated with poor immigrants, crime, and secularism
US banned alcohol trade to Indians in 1802

Missionaries
Christian revival movements entered the frontier, emphasizing temperance
Indian prophets had similar motives and practices
Indian prophets were mostly men, the liquor trade controlled mostly by Indian women
“Backsliding” led to social failures, deaths (6x)
Conversions and temperance revivalists tempered the political and economic agency of native women

Indian Temperance
Handsome Lake was a prophet and temperance advocate for the Iroquois; thought alcohol should be for whites only
Beate of the Delawares pushed reforms
Female respected by some leaders
Also accused of witchcraft
Many women pushed for traditional values
Harder because she's a woman?
“Perhaps the liquor trade continued because alcohol provided many Indians with something that the government could not: a sense of power or a fleeting respite from their troubles” (447)

1763

The Peace of Paris ended the Seven Years' War (9 years, AKA French & Indian War)
Britain wins, taking all mainland claims in North America
Britain had allied with Germany (Hanover), Prussia, Portugal, Iroquois
France had allied with Russia, Sweden, Austria, Germany (Saxony), Spain, Hurons

British aims
Britain feared French control of Ohio territory would strangle their eastern colonies.
Without colonies, France only threatened continental Europe
Quickly they gained the favor of local Indians to fight by proxy
Should Britain defeat France or completely destroy it?
France allowed to keep islands in Caribbean, Newfoundland, and their Senegal colony

1759: Turning Point
British take Quebec
French Atlantic fleet destroyed
Spain felt threatened. Would Britain take South America too? Joined up with France
Britain invades Spanish Cuba, then the Philippines
Before the peace treaty, France secretly gives western Louisiana to Spain

Effects
Britain conquered Canada. The American colonists no longer needed protection from Britain, and the attempt by Parliament to tax the colonists to help pay for the war sparked the American Revolution.
French Quebec colonists were given 18 months to leave; some went to Maine and New Orleans
France and Spain entered a naval arms race. Stronger Bourbon navies made American victory in the Revolutionary War possible.

Debts France incurred in this war and the American Revolution helped cause the French Revolution. The humiliation of the army led to reforms later used by Napoleon.
Prussia survived the war, becoming an important European power. Frederick the Great became one of the most powerful rulers. In 1870 Prussia united Germany.

Russia showed itself to be a major power capable of enormous influence.
Smaller states like The Netherlands and Saxony were becoming increasingly vulnerable.
Spain confirmed that it was a weak state with minimal military power.
While Great Britain, France, and Russia solidified their stance in the world, German and Italian peoples floundered

Britain confirmed itself as the world's dominant naval and economic power
Britain became the dominant power in India, eventually conquering all of it. France slowly left their Indian colonies
Massive war debt by world powers eventually led to worldwide economic collapse
Some non-"Eurocentric" historians believe British control of India made the Industrial Revolution possible
Controlled trade of textiles and dyes
Built Indian railroads, canals, telegraph systems